ECB raises rates as energy prices keep inflation above target
The ECB Governing Council raised its three key interest rates by 25 basis points on 10 September, taking the deposit facility rate to 2.50%, the main refinancing operations rate to 2.65% and the marginal lending facility rate to 2.90% with effect from 16 September. The Council said that the conflict in the Middle East continues to generate inflation pressures and that inflation is set to remain well above target for an extended period.

Same policy rate, different inflation: annual HICP inflation in CEE euro-area members, August 2026 flash estimate. Source: Eurostat; ECB.
The new staff projections see headline inflation averaging 3.0% in 2026, 2.5% in 2027 and 2.1% in 2028, with the figures for 2027 and 2028 revised up since June. Growth projections were revised up to 0.9% for 2026 and 1.4% for 2027, reflecting the greater-than-expected resilience of the euro-area economy, with 1.5% expected in 2028. The Council retained its data-dependent, meeting-by-meeting approach and said it is not pre-committing to a particular rate path.
Energy remains the main driver. Eurostat’s flash estimate put euro-area inflation at 3.3% in August, up from 2.9% in July, with energy prices 14.3% higher than a year earlier. Inflation excluding energy, food, alcohol and tobacco was 2.4%.
What this means for CEE markets: For the seven CEE members of the euro area, the rate increase tightens financing conditions uniformly, but inflation does not move uniformly. Lithuania (5.8%) and Bulgaria (5.1%) face inflation more than twice the ECB’s new deposit rate, so real policy rates remain negative there even after the hike, while in Estonia (1.3%) the same move amounts to a meaningful real tightening. For non-euro CEE economies, the ECB’s decision shifts the external reference point: with policy rates unchanged in Warsaw, interest-rate differentials with the euro area narrow. How central banks in Warsaw, Prague and Budapest respond over the coming months will shape borrowing costs for households and companies across the region.
Parliament sets its position on the SFDR review, opening the way to trilogues
The European Parliament’s ECON Committee adopted its position on the review of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation on 10 September, by 37 votes to 9 with 4 abstentions. The negotiating mandate is due to be announced at the start of the October I plenary session, after which negotiations can begin with the Council, which agreed its own position on 24 June.
MEPs backed the Commission’s proposal to replace the current disclosure-based approach with three standard product categories (sustainable, transition and ESG basics), each of which would have to disclose its investments’ principal adverse impacts on sustainability. The most contested issue was the treatment of fossil fuels in the transition category. Under the committee’s position, companies expanding fossil-fuel production could be included only if at least 20% of their annual investment is directed towards Taxonomy-aligned activities and if, over a rolling three-year period, they invest more in green activities than in new fossil-fuel projects. Firms would also need due-diligence and monitoring processes for categorised products, reviewed at least once a year.
Rapporteur Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy (Renew, NL) presented the compromise as an example of how simplification should work: keeping the objective intact while making the rules more effective for consumers and less burdensome for businesses.
What this means for CEE markets: Sustainable-fund markets in CEE remain relatively small, and many products are distributed by subsidiaries of large cross-border groups that will largely follow group-level categorisation decisions. The more consequential issue for the region may be the transition category. Given the weight of energy-intensive and fossil-fuel-dependent sectors in several CEE economies, a test based on capital expenditure could allow companies with credible transition plans to remain investable rather than being excluded outright. How the final text balances credibility against access to transition finance will help determine whether CEE companies can use the new labels to reach European investors.
ESMA moves Listing Act prospectus rules into implementation
ESMA published on 9 September a package of materials under the Prospectus Regulation reflecting changes introduced by the Listing Act. It comprises a consultation on updated guidelines on disclosure requirements, revised Q&As, final guidelines on supplements that introduce new securities to a base prospectus, and a final report on regulatory technical standards on the key financial information to be included in prospectus summaries.
The consultation aims to help issuers and their advisers understand expected disclosure under the revised regulation, while removing guidance that is no longer necessary. Responses are due by 9 November 2026, with the final guidelines expected in Q2 2027. The RTS, which align summary disclosure with the revised framework and support more proportionate information requirements, have been submitted to the Commission for a decision on adoption.
What this means for CEE markets: The fixed costs of preparing a prospectus weigh most heavily on smaller issuers, and many companies listed on CEE exchanges are small and mid-sized. Simpler and more proportionate disclosure could lower one of the barriers to raising equity and debt on regional markets, which matters as the region looks for alternatives to EU funding and bank credit. The practical effect will depend on how consistently national competent authorities apply the new guidance, which is precisely what ESMA’s convergence work is intended to address.

